top of page
This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.Start Now

Holly Herndon / Akihiko Taniguchi - Artist / Director Statements

Holly Herndon: "So much of Chorus was constructed by spying on my own online habits. It felt fitting to invite Akihiko, who I had been spying on online for a long time before my approach, to contribute the visual treatment of the piece." 

Akihiko Taniguchi: "I was interested in exploring the textures of daily necessities and the embodiment / physicality of the computer and Internet. One of the most striking contemporary images is that of the desktop capture, which is seen commonly on YouTube as part of software tutorials. I like the shots of desktops that are poorly organized and 'lived-in'. 

Referencing one of my earlier pieces "study of real-time 3D Internet", I considered how it corresponds to the personal environment outside of the screen and how particular it is to my identity and my friend's identities. I asked several friends to photograph their desktop environments and then rendered these images with custom 3D software, shooting video by moving throughout this virtual space. This video is a collection of records of life of friends and their Internet environments."

Herndon: "I love the idea of depicting the mundane and quotidian in high definition, and how evocative and individual each of these spaces are. Thinking about intimacy and the laptop is familiar territory for me. I've also been thinking a lot about privacy, particularly in light of the ongoing revelations regarding the NSA, which add a more sinister sub-narrative to Akihiko's piece.

The most crucial conversations happening in technology at the moment focus squarely on our work space, our email, our iSight and our smart phone, and how much we can honestly claim those spaces to be ours at all in an era of indiscriminate and imperceptible surveillance."

  • Bingham, N. (1996). Object-Ions: From Technological Determinism towards Geographies of Relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(6)
     
  • Fuller, S. (2012). CSI: Kuhn and Latour. Social Studies of Science, 42(3), 429–434. 
     
  • Elam, M. (1999). Living Dangerously with Bruno Latour in a Hybrid World. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(4), 1–24. 
     
  • Hornborg, A. (2014). Technology as Fetish: Marx, Latour, and the Cultural Foundations of Capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(4), 119–140.
     

  • Kendall, G. (2013). Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42(1), 
     

  • Khong, L. (2003). Actants and enframing: Heidegger and Latour on technology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34(4), 693–704.
     

  • Latour, B. (n.d.). From Ontology to Deontology.
     

  • Sheely, S. (2008). Latour meets the digital natives : What do we really know. The Technology Source, 908–916. 
     

  • Latour, B. (1991). Technology Is Society Made Durable. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. 
     

  • Latour, B., & Latour For, B. (2010). An Attempt at a “Compositionist Manifesto”: A prologue in the form of an avatar. Source: New Literary History, 41(3), 471–490. 
     

  • Middleton, D. (1997). Aramis or the Love of Technology by Bruno Latour. The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, 396–399. 
     

  • Oppenheim, R. (2007). Actor-network theory and anthropology after science, technology, and society. Anthropological Theory, 7(4), 471–493. 

ANT AND TECHNOLOGY

​

bottom of page